MIG Print Studio: production reporting dashboard for managers
MIG Print Studio uses Taras to collect production figures from an agreed source, check plan, actuals, and gaps, and show them to a manager in one online report. Previously, the director had to search for data, wait for clarification, and check calculations manually.
MIG Print Studio
MIG Print Studio is a Ukrainian B2B company in manufacturing packaging. It works with polyamide casings and labels for food producers.
Before and after: how the reporting workflow changed
Open a diagram for a larger view.
The problemThe manager cannot see the answer at once: someone must search for data, wait for clarification, check records, and request a recalculation. Decisions are delayed.
The resultThe manager gets one summarized view: data is checked, plan and actual sit together, and the report helps move from searching to deciding.
Similar manual reporting? Show Taras where the process gets stuck.
A clearer path from records to a decision
A manager does not need another table. They need a fast answer: what is happening, where is the gap, and what should happen next? In MIG, data moves from scattered records and manual checks to one clear report for the director.
Collect data
Define sources, reporting period, and the format of production records.
Check it
Find gaps, compare plan and actual, and agree the indicators.
See the picture
Bring data into one report that is easy to read before a meeting.
Make the decision
Understand the situation and decide what should happen next.
How the connected process looks
Optimize your processes — tell Taras what to do
Taras has a built-in questionnaire to help you define the task.
How the connection works
Taras receives production records from an agreed source, checks completeness and key figures, and then prepares a clear report. The connection removes extra handoffs between tables and messages, while the final decision remains with the director.
The practical result of the connection
Result for the manager
Plan, actual, and key gaps are collected in one report. The manager does not need to rebuild the picture from several sources each time.
Result for the team
Less manual searching, waiting, and recalculation. The team can spend more attention on explaining causes and preparing a decision.
From daily reporting effort to a decision in seconds
| Period | Before Taras | After Taras | Time saved |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working day | 2 hours | 10 sec | ~ 2 hours |
| Working week | 10 hours | 50 sec | ~ 10 hours |
| Working month | 42 hours | 3 min 30 sec | ~ 42 hours |
Confirmed in the case
- A manager-facing online report
- Plan, actuals, and gaps in one view
- Report preparation after agreed data is received
Scenario estimates
- $1,248.26 as a scenario estimate of time value
- Up to $50,000 as potential risk exposure
What that recovered time is worth
Using a $5,000 monthly owner-income scenario and 168 working hours per month.
Maximum case estimate. Monday–Friday only, 21 working days per month, 8 hours per working day. This is the value of recovered owner time, not a measured increase in profit.
Liked the results? Delegate the routine to Taras
Start with one repeatable report, control task, or coordination workflow.
Delegate the routineWhat changed in the MIG reporting workflow?
Your next success is yours. Delegate the routine to Taras
Ready to find the first workflow worth delegating?
Choose a plan